Democrats Say Iraq Spending With Tax Cuts Is Unaffordable
The same old argument.
Bush plans to pay for it with the tax cuts!
I know this is complicated but it works.
In 1982 the Federal Government took in around 500 billion in revenue.
After two major Tax cuts by Reagan and a drop in the top tax rates from over 70 percent to about 28 percent!
By 1987 the Government was taking in almost double that figure!
Around 975 billion dollars!
Tax cuts create revenue.
JFK knew it
Reagan knew it.
I know it,
GW knows it.
Why can't the Dems figure this out?
I'll tell you why, They don't care about the deficit! Tax cuts mean less power for them. The less percentage we pay the less dependant we are on them.

Two versions for the same story. One for Europe (the way they really feel) and one for the U.S.
I thought journalism was supposed to be free of opinion and slant?

Is it working?: "Iraq is the only Arab country today where all political parties, from communist to conservative, operate freely. Visitors will be impressed by the openness of the political debate there, something not found anywhere else in the Arab world. Also, for the first time, Iraq has no political prisoners.
Almost 150 newspapers and magazine are now published there, offering a diversity not found in any other Arab country. One theme of these new publications is the need for democratization in the Arab world. This may be putting the cart before the horse. What Arabs, and Muslims in general, most urgently need is basic freedom, without which democracy cannot be built.
The impact of Iraq's liberation is already felt throughout the region. "

Political hate speech: "GILLESPIE EXPLAINED ON NBC'S MEET THE PRESS: 'IF YOU SAW THE DEBATE THE OTHER NIGHT WITH THE NINE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, I THINK HISTORY WILL SHOW THIS FIELD HAS TAKEN PRESIDENTIAL DISCOURSE TO A NEW LOW. THE RHETORIC YOU HEAR, ON EITHER SIDE OF THE AISLE, RONALD REAGAN NEVER SAID JIMMY CARTER COULDN'T FIND COUNTRIES IN HIS OWN HEMISPHERE.

'MONDALE NEVER SAID REAGAN WAS A MISERABLE FAILURE. WHEN BILL CLINTON RAN AGAINST GEORGE BUSH, HE DIDN'T COMPARE HIM TO SADDAM HUSSEIN OR THE TALIBAN. WHEN BOB DOLE RAN AGAINST CLINTON, HE DIDN'T SAY HE WAS A PHONY OR LIAR. THE WORDS WE'RE HEARING FROM THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES IS SO BEYOND POLITICAL DEBATE. THIS IS POLITICAL HATE SPEECH. "

"Enemies of freedom are making a desperate stand there and there they must be defeated. This will take time and require sacrifice. Yet we will do whatever is necessary, we will spend what is necessary, to achieve this essential victory in the war on terror, to promote freedom, and to make our nation more secure,"


"The people of Iraq are emerging from a long trial. For them, there will be no going back to the days of the dictator ? to the miseries and humiliation he inflicted on that good country. For the Middle East and the world, there will be no going back to the days of fear ? when a brutal and aggressive tyrant possessed terrible weapons. And for America, there will be no going back to the era before September 11th, 2001 ? to false comfort in a dangerous world. We have learned that terrorist attacks are not caused by the use of strength ? they are invited by the perception of weakness. And the surest way to avoid attacks on our own people is to engage the enemy where he lives and plans. We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today, so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities."


G.W. Bush

Democratic discrimination: "Despite their inevitable protesting to the contrary, it is clear that Ted Kennedy's gang of 45 discriminated against Estrada because he is Hispanic, like they discriminate against another nominee, William Pryor, for his devout Catholicism. Indeed, if Congress were an ordinary employer and a federal judgeship were treated as a job under federal antidiscrimination law, then Estrada would likely win on a claim of employment discrimination. "